Article written by


2 Responses

  1. Avatar of jacksarfatti
    jacksarfatti at | |

    I respectfully disagree with the premise of this paper. It is incomplete in the sense of Einstein in his debate with Bohr - not yet settled. I do agree that Heisenberg's potent are physically real fields, but they are not a complete description of reality that also has classical matter dynamical degrees of freedom independent of h. This picture has been recently clarified and quantified in the papers of Roderick Sutherland.

  2. Avatar of jacksarfatti
    jacksarfatti at | |

    Potent should be "potentia" this website has a "spell checker" that deleted the "ia" and there is no "edit" option.

Please comment with your real name using good manners.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.