New Submission: Reply to Marchildon: absorption and non-unitarity remain well-defined in the Relativistic Transactional Interpretation

I rebut some erroneous statements and attempt to clear up some misunderstandings in a recent set of critical remarks by Marchildon regarding the Relativistic Transactional Interpretation (RTI) in this Journal, showing that his negative conclusions regarding the transactional model are ill-founded.

Paper link here: Reply to LM IJQF4

Article written by

Avatar of Ruth Kastner

Please comment with your real name using good manners.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.