Meaning of the Wave Function

Quantum Bayesianism and QBism

This topic contains 0 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by  Christopher A. Fuchs 4 years, 5 months ago.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #790

    Both the article and the slides summarize the Quantum Bayesian point of view of quantum mechanics, with special emphasis on the view’s outer edges — dubbed QBism. QBism has its roots in personalist Bayesian probability theory, is crucially dependent upon the tools of quantum information theory, and most recently, has set out to investigate whether the physical world might be of a type sketched by some false-started philosophies of 100 years ago (pragmatism, pluralism, nonreductionism, and meliorism). Beyond conceptual issues, work at Perimeter Institute is focussed on the hard technical problem of finding a good representation of quantum mechanics purely in terms of probabilities, without amplitudes or Hilbert-space operators. The best candidate representation involves a mysterious entity called a symmetric informationally complete quantum measurement. Contemplation of it gives a way of thinking of the Born Rule as an addition to the rules of probability theory, applicable when an agent considers gambling on the consequences of his interactions with a newly recognized universal capacity: dimension (formerly Hilbert-space dimension). (The word “capacity” should conjure up an image of something like gravitational mass — a body’s mass measures its capacity to attract other bodies. With hindsight one can say that the founders of quantum mechanics discovered another universal capacity, “dimension.”) The article ends by showing that the egocentric elements in QBism represent no impediment to pursuing quantum cosmology and outlining some directions for future work.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.